Skip to main content

Napoleon in Egypt

Nina Burleigh 2007 Napoleon's Scientists and the Unveiling of Egypt. Harper Collins New York.
A popular and very readable account of the 1798 adventure by Napoleon to deny Egypt to the British. Hundreds of scholars and students accompanied the expeditions and were feted but eventually abandoned by Napoleon. Denon wrote an account of travels in upper and lower Egypt which was rapidly translated into English but the main output was the massive Description of Egypt published in several parts, initially under the authority of Napoleon, but after he was deposed under that of the restored monarch - this despite many of the scholars being treated abominably under the new regime. The book was one foundation of the incorporation of ancient Egyptian design elements into Empire Style. The Taschen edition (1990) is probably the most accessible, but it is also online. Along with many of the army, a sizeable proportion of the scholars were never to leave Egypt, dying there, many of the plague.

The early contribution of engineers the Egyptology was a surprise. A military engineer recognised the importance of the Rosetta Stone when it was found in work to strengthen a fortification. The records made of the monuments of Egypt were made the engineers, those best skilled to make measured drawings. It was unfortunate the standards they started did not persist in the rest of the century - justifiably called the rape of Egypt.

So you think the Rosetta Stone is black? After it was found it had ink applied to the surface and it was used directly for taking paper copies. Over the years many more materials were added to the surface. The grano-diorite has recently been cleaned British Museum page - it turns out to be pinkish grey with a pink strip. Photo after cleaning.

Popular posts from this blog

  This quote struck me in a compendium of quotes about archaeology: “Archaeology is the peeping Tom of the sciences. It is the sandbox of men who care not where they are going; they merely want to know where everyone else has been.” Jim Bishop, American, Journalist, 1907–1987. Excuse the sexism – of its time I guess – when the stereotypical archaeologist was male. Ther rest connected with me because I had just been reading   How Archaeologists Can Solve The Earth’s ‘Wicked Problems’   Scoop News – attributed to “Human Bridges” The guts of the thesis is: “…. archaeology is essential to the future of humanity and planetary health. This is for three main reasons. First, archaeologists have the capacity to think about and to understand humanity of the past, and to project that insight into the future. Second, archaeologists are uniquely placed to comprehend the many and complex ways in which humans, over time, have related to their environment and environ...
  Part Two -Getting involved in Archaeology as an Interest.   Part One looked at archaeology as a profession to get into, this looks at other aspects for people with other ambitions.   The early 19 th C origins of archaeology were from a time when there were no archaeologists – the people that pioneered it were often trained in other fields and many of them were employed in other fields. Now the field seems to be dominated by professionals, with a long path of training and experience needed to become one (See Part One).   Is there now no role for those with an interest in archaeology?   There is.   An Invitation to Archaeology:   “We are all archaeologists now.” ( The Archaeological Imagination . Michael Shanks)   If we have an interest in archaeology, it is because we have been exposed to archaeology in some form. Through that exposure we can start to see that the hand of past people is still with us in the physical world...
  Quotes for Archaeologists I used to have these in the page formatting of this blog - but it didn't work on iPhones and the ilk so took it down. Here they are as a post instead.