Skip to main content
"Die Erinnerung ist das einzige Paradies , aus welchem wir nicht getrieben werden können." 
- The memory is the only paradise from which we cannot be driven.
Johann Paul Richter otherwise known as Jean Paul, 1812

Do archaeologists create paradises of the past? The authors of Genesis did. While we might not write stories that so explicitly include a descent from a state of grace, we surely do place emphasis the extraordinary and the great from the past, to the exclusion of the mundane.The impression can be left that the past is a land of heroes, greater than the present day. Yet archaeology should be the stuff of the ordinary - for that is a large part of what we find. We should be able to tell an unvarnished version of the past. What are the enemies of that objective? - why ourselves in large part - we want to see what we do as important and illustrative and tend to present it in that light.

Who else? - why ourselves again - if we are the descendants of those who's history we presenting. We want to see ourselves as the descendants of noble people of achievement. Colonised indigenous people can suffer particularly from this. They have good historical reasons to want to represent their ancestors well, better than the way they were stigmatised, or at best stereotyped by colonists. Non-indigenous archaeologists are often more aware of the colonial history than their contemporaries and sympathise with this - but have we not all endured some new-age version of the past presented from an indigenous point of view in silence - and suffering - through the distortions!

An Australian archaeologist once said that the only people over whom aboriginal people had any power were archaeologists, and if offered the opportunity they would inevitably use it. Of course they should have domain over their cultural heritage. But should that be to the extent that it must be distorted in presentation?
So what are the counters to this? Intellectual rigor and debate are a good start. Another is simply the people themselves. Their physical remains tell the stories of their lives - brutish and short as they sometime are. We need not pursue those placed to rest by their contemporaries - there are chance discoveries or disturbances often enough in our development obsessed world . But we should make a respectful study of these remains before their re-internment.  We can find their life histories not otherwise accessible to us - how long they lived, how many children women had, what stresses they placed on their bodies, their health, injuries and illnesses. Their DNA if it survives, can tell vast amounts more Too often a study is not happening and it is because of the exertion of power referred to above. 

It is time for debate on that. Archaeologists should not forego this important window on the past and need to assert its value - and its particular value is that it is a strong dose of reality.

Popular posts from this blog

Some years ago I bought a copy of Peter Buck's printed Cawthron Lecture - The Coming of the Maori.Tucked inside it was a printed postcard of two Maori men. It was not the usual subject for a Maori postcard - usually they were tourist scenes. The two intrigued me - the sitting one clearly of higher status and unusually well dressed for the period. It seemed an unlikely subject. The card was tucked onto a bookcase shelf and has sat their occasionally attracting my attention ever since, until I recently watched a Shipwreck TV programme about the 1863 wreck of the Delaware near Nelson. It was the well known story of the rescue of most of the crew by the "New Zealand Grace Darling" Huria Matenga. You can read her story and more on the wreck here:    http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nzbound/delaware.htm    http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/1966/matenga-huria-te-amoho-wikitoria      http://www.theprow.org.nz/maori/maori-rescues/ ...
  Quotes for Archaeologists I used to have these in the page formatting of this blog - but it didn't work on iPhones and the ilk so took it down. Here they are as a post instead.
  For Museums. I love museums – there that is out. I have been associated with them all my life – as a donor to at least five, associated with their research with three, published in their Records and as a Board Member for one. I love that they use physical objects to tell a story. They can have art galleries and libraries and archives attached – they are often a good fit - but none are necessary. It is physical objects that are their heart. Their essential nature lies around those objects. They need a building to protect them – from decay, theft – and that building itself has to be protected, from fire, decay, earthquake – a suitable place for guarding taonga – treasures. The collections need to be catalogued, by someone who knows enough to adequately describe them and they need to be available for experts to study and, within reason, to anyone else who develops an interest in them. A Museum needs its public interface, through displays that engage its public. It does not...